Infinite Blackjack: Rules, RTP, and Side Bets
Updated
Evolution’s Infinite Blackjack seats unlimited players on one hand and adds a 6 Card Charlie, which is rare and genuinely good. Three sources give it three different house edges. We computed the game both ways, and the disagreement turns out to be a single unresolved rule rather than anyone’s arithmetic.
- Eight decks, S17, 3:2, no doubling after a split, split aces receive one card.
- 6 Card Charlie: six cards without busting wins immediately, even against a blackjack. Worth 0.160%.
- Published figures: 0.45%, 0.49% and 0.53%. Our two readings are 0.448% and 0.546%.
- The four side bets cost between 3.70% and 6.2% — up to fourteen times the game.
The rules
Eight decks. Dealer stands on soft 17. Blackjack pays 3:2. No doubling after a split. Split once, and split aces receive one card only. No surrender. Unlimited players are dealt the same hand and each makes their own decisions from it.
The good rule is the 6 Card Charlie: reach six cards without busting and you win immediately, and it beats a dealer blackjack. We compute it as worth 0.160%, which matches the independent published figure of 0.16% exactly. It also applies to each hand after a split, which is unusual and worth a little more again, though not enough to change any decision.
Three published figures, and what separates them
Infinite Blackjack is quoted at 0.45% by an independent analyst, 0.49% by the in-game help, and 0.53% by a review site. That is a wide spread for a game whose rules are all published, and it is usually presented as one of those things.
It is not. The sources disagree about whether the dealer checks for blackjack against a ten, and that single rule is worth 0.103% — more than the entire spread between the three figures.
We computed the game both ways. With a full peek we get 0.448%, which is within a thousandth of the independent analyst’s 0.45%. With a peek on aces only — Evolution’s usual practice — we get 0.546%. The three published numbers all sit between those two.
So the honest answer is that the game is somewhere in that range and the rules panel at your table decides which end. If it says the dealer checks only against an ace, use the higher figure and do not split nines or double eleven against a ten.
The side bets are the expensive part
Four are offered, and every one of them costs more than the game by a wide margin:
| Side bet | House edge | Times the main game |
|---|---|---|
| 21+3 | 3.70% | about 7x |
| Any Pair | 4.10% | about 8x |
| Hot 3 | 5.40% | about 10x |
| Bust It | 5.83% to 6.18% | about 12x |
Sources differ on Bust It, which is why it carries a range. The 21+3 and Any Pair figures are ours and are exact — a side bet involves no decisions, so it is combinatorics rather than a solver.
The point of the right-hand column is the only one that matters. A player agonising over the 0.103% peek rule while placing a Hot 3 bet has the priorities exactly backwards.
The 6 Card Charlie is rarer than it sounds
We are aware of only two live tables anywhere that offer a 6 Card Charlie: this one and Pragmatic’s ONE Blackjack. On a physical casino floor it is rarer still.
It is worth 0.160%, which is more than the difference between six decks and eight, several times over. It also does something no other rule does: it gives you a reason to hit a hand you would otherwise stand on, when you already hold four or five cards. That situation is rare enough not to need a chart, but when it arrives, drawing is usually right.
Counting and fairness
Unlimited seats do not change the shoe, so counting works exactly as it would at a seven-seat table — and runs into exactly the same wall.
Live blackjack is the most checkable game in an online casino, and that is worth saying plainly. The cards are physical, the shoe is on camera, and you can watch the deal. Nothing about the shuffle or the burn is hidden behind a random number generator the way it is in RNG blackjack.
What a stream cannot show you is the part that matters: where the cut card goes, whether the shoe is the same one after a break, and how the shuffle was done off camera. None of that requires dishonesty to hurt you. A perfectly honest table with a cut card at half the shoe is still a table where counting does not pay.
So the fairness question and the profitability question are separate, and only the second has a clear answer. A license tells you the game is not rigged. It does not tell you the game is beatable.
Keep reading
By Martin Kosek · every number on this site is computed by us, not copied.
← Back to guides